Eamon brennan of ESPN has talked about kanter being ruled ineligible. according to him, he feels that if we win the appeal to have kanter play we are a lock to be a final four team, however without him, we are not as good. here is an excerpt from his article:
[QUOTE]With Kanter, Kentucky could’ve well been a Final Four team. Without him, well, not so much.
Of course, it’d be foolish to count out a team with this much talent. Knight could be one of the best point guards in the country this year; Jones might be a one-and-done-level wing; and Calipari is a master at molding young teams into elite operations. But Kanter’s absence is unequivocally a setback. Whether it defines UK’s season, or becomes a mere historical footnote on the way to greater things, remains in Kentucky’s hands.[/QUOTE]
so here is my question to you big blue nation: haw far will we go if we have kanter? if not? the conditions that need to happen to go that far? your options are: 1) NIT 2)play in games (in newly expanded NCAA tourny) 3) 2nd round 4) sweet sixteen 5) elite eight 6) final four 7) championship game 8)NCAA champions
