Thread: [BBN502] Enes Kanter: Good or bad for Kentucky?

My question is one that I haven't heard asked yet and that is, If the appeals committee rules Enes eligible to play is that decision definite and final? and if he is ruled to be able to play does that mean the NCAA can't come back later on after this season and say there was a mistake they made with something and try to vacate any wins he was a part of or try to place any sanctions on UK? If that is a possibility it would be better for UK to set him out, as it would be bad for Enes but better for the program as a whole. I, like many of the BBN don't want any wins vacated or probation brought on to the program. That would not only delay our national title hopes but we would lose our all time wins lead to UNC and maybe Kansas and more importantly we would most likely lose our 2011 recruits. Recruiting would be hard even for Cal if that would to happen. I would love Enes to play but only if it is safe for UK, as the tradition of the school is bigger than any one player. What does the rest of NOB think??? GO BIG BLUE!!!!

I must agree with you no matter how much of an asset he would be we don't need any negatives resulting from him possilbly playing.

I for one believe that if the clear a player to play they should not be allowed to pop up and say Oops we made a mistake we shouldnt have cleared him your wins are vacated! Thats to extreme! They should learn from their mistakes and do what they can to ensure that they do not repeat them! They should not punish they school's basketball program for playing a player that they cleared!